Thursday, September 26, 2002
How To Wrap Stuffed Animals
Auch Verteidiger Mahler muss in den Zeugenstand
Ehningen/Stuttgart - In the trial of right-wing singer-songwriter Frank Ehninger Rennicke before the District Court judges will now hear the original lyrics of the Bard as evidence. These numerous invoices, purchase orders and written orders by customers of the alleged CDs are read publicly.
By Bernd S. Winckler
In the ongoing since last week's proceedings before the 38th Trial Chamber against Rennicke and his wife, it is primarily about hate speech. The prosecution wants the text content of the CD to be distributed by Rennicke expellees song ban and prohibit the songwriter further public appearances. In addition to the penalty imposed by the District Court Böblingen Imprisonment may be increased (reported RRC). Rennicke is represented by NPD lawyer Horst Mahler.
The 38th Trial Chamber has now accepted the request of defense counsel, to prove the innocence or guilt to listen to the songs and read the lyrics. Likewise, the content of invoices and orders that the Court has already taken numerous phone logs by playing a look. Without knowledge of the defendant's private telephone had been tapped by the state police. As then by Mahler but still during the playing of the tape logs protested and now listen to the songs of the bards no longer wanted the court refused. Thus, the Stuttgart court becomes a concert hall.
Jurist Mahler wird sich übrigens demnächst auch im Zeugenstand wiederfinden. Er soll in diesem Verfahren aussagen, weil er möglicherweise Texte von Rennickes Lieder redigiert habe. Der Prozess, der zunächst auf nur drei Tage terminiert war, verzögert sich deshalb. Jedoch soll am nächsten Mittwoch ein Urteil gefällt werden, falls die Verteidigung nicht weitere Anträge stellt, so ein Gerichtssprecher.
Böblinger Kreiszeitung 26.09.2002
Der dritte Prozeßtag - Anmerkungen eines Prozeßbeobachters
Am gestrigen Tage hatte ich Gelegenheit, mit einem Begleiter, diesen poltischen Prozeß gegen Ute und Frank Rennicke to follow. The long journey from Lübeck was worth it to get confirmation that political processes are always the same stitch.
First of hours "evidence" - in this case, several orders in the details - read, are generally not in dispute. Apparently, even the jurors were partially overwhelmed at this time-consuming evidence, because to see for all observers, this fell temporarily in the sleeping beauty - just as the police officers present and newspaper people, if at all present. were questions of jurors, in spite of many points not so far - one must ask at the end of the process, as it at the sentencing have been involved.
The one-sided biased reporting on the Rennicke - process can still be very desirable. Is that our free report, find a duck hunt the other?
to correcting the authorities "newspaper report" of the Böblingen district newspaper of 26/09/2002:
first There are not "judge", but a judge along with two lay judges.
second The lyrics have been read since de first hearing days from the judges - one was the song so far.
third It is all about during this political process only to the so-called "hate speech".
4th The Rechtsanwal Horst Mahler is not a "NPD lawyer, attorney sonern represents as well as the National Democratic Party.
5th It has so far heard no recorded phone conversation. A "phone log" can not be heard because this is an "evaluation" is a review of a police officer - "Protocol"!
6th The lawyer Horst Mahler has not been able to "protest" during the play, as yet nothing has been heard.
7th The songs of singer-songwriter has not been heard so far - and the lawyers of the singer-songwriter have gstellt the request to hear more songs of the bard - and not "against" spoken.
7. Der "Jurist Mahler" wird sich auch nicht im Zeugenstand wiederfinden, da er gar keine Texte des Liedermachers "redigiert" hatte. Gutachter von Liedttexten war der Hamburger Anwalt Jürgen Rieger, der am 25.09.02 als Zeuge auftrat (was vom obrigen Zeitungsschreiber überhaupt nicht erwähnt wird).
8. Der Prozeß war vom Gericht von Beginn an auf fünf Tage festgelegt - nicht auf drei.
9. Das aufschlußreiche Verlesen einer Broschüre mit dem Titel "Dokumente der Verteidigung" zu zeitschichtlichen Dingen im Dritten Reich wird vollkommen verschwiegen - gerade dieser Punkt ist aber geradezu typisch für das Thema "Offenkundigkeit" und Medienberichterstattung bzw. Totschweigen.
10.The death threats against the couple and their lawyer will Rennicke excluded completely!
11th The journalist Bernard S. Winckler must presumably have been in a different process, since almost all the information content represented by him as false and were content with the reality now almost nothing in common. As an employee of a newspaper, he should perceive better the position of a caretaker.
I invite all national forces who live in the Stuttgart area, on, in the process, on Friday, 27 September and on Wednesday, 02 is fortgestzt October 2002, to attend to learn the polti between processes the required public will, yet so as to "independent and impartial" coverage of the newspapers, you can not count. Everyone should be beweußt slowly, here it is not a processes crossing paths with many, but a fundamental decision, to take the other tomorrow.
Dieter Kern / Alliance RIGHT
09/26/2002
-
Rennicke Frank sees himself as a victim
Ehningen / STUTTGART - The third trial for the appeal trial for sedition before the
Stuttgart Regional Court against the right-wing singer-songwriter Frank Rennicke took advantage of the accused on Wednesday for the first time zu einer ausführlichen Stellungnahme. Angeblich hatte die Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Schriften sein "Heimatvertriebenenlied'' genehmigt.
Von Steffen Eigner
Mit dem fraglichen "Heimatvertriebenenlied'' wolle er zum Ausdruck bringen, das Deutschland das Land der Deutschen bleiben solle. Er habe nie zu Hass oder Verleumdung aufstacheln wollen. Der Text des von ihm vertonten und gesungenen Liedes stamme von einem österreichischen Dichter, die beanstandete Passage sei eigentlich auf das seit dem Ersten Weltkrieg italienischen Südtirol gemünzt. Er selbst habe das Lied nur auf seine eigene Heimat uminterpretiert, so der 38-jährige Frank Rennicke vor Gericht.
In his defense, he stated that he had let the song prior to its publication examine several legal, then sold in 1986 and sung. Only in 1994 it had been indexed by the Federal Review Board documents, without having had time to sufficiently may comment. "They just indexed all of my text, without differentiating which passages were actually objected''to the presiding judge complained Rennicke Zimmert. For his CD's" early works and I'''II''early works, which are now the subject of criminal proceedings , is a new version of the song expellees after negotiations with the Review and its orally granted Approval arose. He invoked his right to expression.
To his national sentiments he had come because he had grown up near Brunswick on the German-German border. When asked why the limit was there, and he simply could not visit his grandparents on the other side with the bike, he would have said his teacher, "it was the just punishment for Hitler's war.''" These responses were for me unsatisfactory and the more critical then my questions were, the more I was labeled''so Rennicke.
had previously been a judge Zimmert read years ago in the far-right scene interview posted Rennicke where Rennicke had himself described as "national bard''and" father of a growing group of young German.'' At the interview, the defendant took no position.
Leonberger local paper, 26.09.2002
Ehningen / Stuttgart: Third day in the trial of Frank Rennicke
defense witness from Hamburg
From our editor Hans-Jörg Zürn
"I think the song is legally safe ' , for the Hamburg lawyer Juergen Rieger is not understandable why the Ehninger electricians and songwriter Frank Rennicke is on trial for sedition.
Ten months on probation Rennicke had received before the District Court and his wife Ute had to pay 500 euros for aid. The couple also went in appeal as the prosecution, which requires a higher penalty. Now decide the Stuttgart Regional Court.
There invited Rennicke lawyer Horst Mahler, former terrorist and now links the Star Bar-right scene, his colleague Jürgen Rieger as a witness. Rieger, who describes himself as a "set national" peer-reviewed, indicated that more than 100 pamphlets, writings and lyrics. He stood in the reputation of being more critical than colleagues: "I do not want anyone running into the knife."
For the now 37-year-old Frank Rennicke he had already been repeatedly active: "I know him for 20 years.". At the of the Federal Review Board objected writings "expellees song" of the Hamburg Ehninger remembered, however, not initially.
When he had it but read in the courtroom, he stated: "That's what I actually checked and found to be harmless." He did not see that by the text children and young people socially or ethically disoriented or would even endangered, like the Federal Review Board had established.
On the third trial for not only the indexed song was at the center, but it was also about material that should have sent Frank Rennicke in its mail order to customers. Here are the undisputed Order brochures that advertise in those for CDs, cassettes, songbooks, magazines with talk about the former Republican chief Franz Schonhuber, cups, T-shirts or posters.
a forbidden
of criminal crucial are the so-called "Documents of the defense," the judges Zimmert leaving. Allegedly suppressed facts about the Holocaust are written in it. The reports and testimony about the killing of millions of Jews are presented in this paper as untrustworthy.
It is listed on the list of inflammatory and thus forbidden writings, a confiscation order is available. Frank Rennicke is suspected that he had settled the issue in shipments to its customers.
On Friday, the process continues at 9.15 clock. Among other things, then a member of the Federal inspection station for youth at risk the writing to speak.
a newspaper, 26.09.2002
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment