Party Supplies Motocross Dirt Bike

Notizen von P. Claude Barthe FSSPX - Teil 3

Why of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. the acceptance of its demand, which it has already accepted?

all the rest already [on conciliar innovations] was adopted potential. In fact, Archbishop Lefebvre on 5 May 1988 at the beginning of a "Protocol on an agreement" is a "doctrinal declaration" signed, which he has never called into question. In it he declared that the teaching of number 25 of "Lumen Gentium" to accept the due consent to the Magisterium in its various debt levels (someone asked him not to testify enjoy this or that passage of the Second Vatican Council's solemn or ordinary infallibility, what would have been clarified by the Holy See before). He also recognized the validity of the liturgy in its new form, if they are celebrated according to the Holy See approved texts. Finally, he undertook (as a third of the five points): "With regard to certain of the Second Vatican Council, learned of certain points or after the Council, reform of the liturgy and worship, which are difficult to reconcile with the tradition Appear we undertake in their studies and the Holy See have a positive attitude and avoid any controversy. " The commitment was based on the "absence of controversy" and not on an absurd "zero criticism", which incidentally, is only required by the traditionalists.

When the recent interview, Bishop Fellay on 25 February 2009 Rachad Armanios granted www.lecourrier.ch, close reading, is not so much the recognition of the Council, the Bishop Fellay rejects , rather he denies that the Holy See is not of him that tangible "recognition" is required have. [...] The problem up to the generous decision of the Pope with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. had passed, was the result of the decision of its founder , the bishop ordained for his institution to anticipate and without papal mandate to carry out, with the explanation he gave an "emergency". The external adversaries, however, have subtle doctrinal obstacle to the preamble raised again and set this to "objective allies" both certain elements and certain malicious and spiteful habits within the community. In reality, there is a wall that was built solely immediately to prevent it coming to a unity of all true Catholics and in the future to a fruitful relationship in the swing of the theology of the church to the world.

Why would you want the living tradition of the Church would stop , not the Vatican II itself - that in itself would be absurd - but at a certain Vatican II ?

P. Claude Barthe SSPX

Sanct MARCELLE, ORA PRO NOBIS!