Thus the title of a chapter in the book" you have him dethroned "of Archbishop Lefebvre. Here are some passages from it to the consideration for the present.
The revolution in tiara and gown
"In any case, a reflection of an old friend of Cardinal Roncalli, the future John XXIII, illuminating on this issue.. The news of the death of Pius XII entrusted the old Dom Lambert Beauduin, a friend of Roncalli, P. Bouyer on: "If they Roncalli . Choose is saved everything: It would be able to convene a council and to give the ecumenism consecrated in "Dom Lambert Beauduin Cardinal Roncalli knew well, he already knew in 1958 that became Roncalli, Pope, and this would achieve ecumenism - a safe very well-providing opportunity - by a council. If, however, says ecumenism, says religious freedom and liberalism. The "revolution in tiara and gown" was not improvised. (P. 160)
The revolutionary tactics at the Council
"allegation of error or ambiguity or a dangerous orientation, . Immediately after or before assertion in the opposite direction, destined to the conservative Council Fathers to weigh in safety "(p. 170)
Two examples:
first The Latin: "So it was with the Constitution on the Liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium : by writing in No. 36 § 2:" A larger space is the vernacular may be granted "entrusted to the Episcopal Conferences to decide whether they People did not want to take language or (No. 36 § 3), the author of the text opened the door to the abolition of Latin in the liturgy. To this demand to weaken, they were concerned about to write to No. 36 § 1. "The purpose of the use of the Latin language, without prejudice to particular law, be preserved in the Latin rites' made safe by the claim that fathers swallowed without problems, the other two . '(p. 170)
second Freedom of religion: "Just let the Declaration on Religious Freedom Dignitatis Humanae , the last scheme of many fathers had been rejected, Paul VI. even add a paragraph that essentially said the following: "This declaration contains nothing that is contrary to the tradition." But all that is therein, is contrary to the tradition! Now someone will say: "But you read it! As it is written: There is nothing in it, which is contrary to the tradition "- Yes, that is written ... But it does not prevent all the tradition is contrary! And this sentence was added at the last minute by the Pope, to force - especially the English bishops - who were in opposition to this scheme. It is easy, retrospectively, a label, stick a paper on safety! ! An incredible action "(p. 170)
Conclusion: A Catholic reading of Vatican II" is practically impossible "
"I must confess that it is not able to clean the Council of the liberal and modernist spirit that imbued most of the schemes. The authors were calculated namely the infected by this spirit experts and fathers. . What they want - if a document is written entirely in the wrong spirit, it is virtually impossible to clean it with this spirit, we would have to write it from scratch, to give it a Catholic spirit "(p. 168), Sanct MARCELLE, ORA PRO NOBIS!
0 comments:
Post a Comment