On 3 February 2009 published a published P. Ceriani SSPX SSPX WATCH call, among other things, he had sent to the authority of the Brotherhood. This publication earned him a first a "warning" , which was reported to him personally by Bishop Fellay, such as the "Courrier de Tychique" of 22 Announced in March 2004. The fact that a "warning" was issued, would have to be really secretive and would be so even if Bishop Fellay had not talked about it himself with a group of nuns, of which he subsequently demanded silence.
Unfortunately, or - depending on your view - fortunately, the message is still leaked. The author of the article, Max Barrett, who as a chauffeur for Archbishop Lefebvre had worked, also confirmed that he had verified the information through a telephone conversation with P. Ceriani.
would clean the circumstance of a "warning" to P. Ceriani not so much as raising awareness, Barrett writes in his article, if not Bishop Fellay in the course of a lecture in front of about 50 priests a given problem statement would: Bishop Fellay was in the process of the failure to differentiate between the terms "conciliar church" and "official church" been seriously annoyed. Obviously he was in the process, the modern language to accept, then Barret.
was a result of this blunder of the Superior General at the above-mentioned priests meeting in view of current threats to exclude some fraternity members a climate ruled the eloquent silence which itself had recognized the bravest and most learned clerics.
Only one had got up to make an objection in law: The "incorrigible" P. Ceriani ! He asked for the floor and was limited to a portion of the lead article written by Archbishop Lefebvre of Fidelite, No. 66 (November-December 1988) to read - in a sober and respectful tone. Nothing else. Then he sat down in peace. Then said Bishop Fellay were silent and not even the other priests. "A painful silence lay dead at the meeting," said one of the priests present.
Here are some passages from the editorial said, "Where is the visible church? The visible church is known by their properties, which they had always made their visibility: It is agreed, holy, catholic and apostolic . I ask you: Where are the true characteristics of the Church? Are they more in the official church (it is not the visible church, but the official Church) at or us, in what we represent and in what we are? It is clear that we are the ones who maintain the unity of faith, who disappeared in the official Church. A bishop believes this, not someone else, is the faith and contain their vile heresies catechisms. Where in Rome is the unity of the faith? Where is the unity of faith in the world? There are well we the ones they have maintained. "" I noticed the will of Rome to impose us their ideas and think their way . Cardinal Ratzinger told me one day: "But, Monseigneur, there is only one church, one can not create a parallel church!" What church was it for? The conciliar church, that's clear! He has said explicitly: "If we accept this protocol, your page must also do something for us: I think it would be good if it in Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet in addition to measuring the Brotherhood every Sunday a new show for the parish there, the church is a "They clearly see that he wanted to lead us to the conciliar church..
acting for the Archbishop, it is an evidence: The official church is the conciliar church! And he added: " It is clear that they are want to impose these new products to eradicate the tradition. you do not confess to something, because they value the traditional Mass, but simply a matter for us to cheat and to reduce our resistance. They break destroy an edge of the block of the tradition to him. That is their strategy, their tactics. "
Sanct MARCELLE, ORA PRO NOBIS!
0 comments:
Post a Comment